<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joost: No love for Linux?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/</link>
	<description>tagline?  No thanks.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Bowling</title>
		<link>http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/#comment-8800</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 07:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/#comment-8800</guid>
		<description>Is there a difference with the Joost TV system and the Joost on SourceForge? http://joost.sourceforge.net/
It's described as Streaming Transformations for XML (STX)  and that sounds like it's at least the display portion of what the Joost TV system is.  It is also written in Java and is fully compatable with Linux and other OSs, per SorceForge.

If so, why is Joost TV holding back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a difference with the Joost TV system and the Joost on SourceForge? <a href="http://joost.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://joost.sourceforge.net/</a><br />
It&#8217;s described as Streaming Transformations for XML (STX)  and that sounds like it&#8217;s at least the display portion of what the Joost TV system is.  It is also written in Java and is fully compatable with Linux and other OSs, per SorceForge.</p>
<p>If so, why is Joost TV holding back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH</title>
		<link>http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/#comment-3578</link>
		<dc:creator>AH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/#comment-3578</guid>
		<description>chillax fool, they promised to make a native linux version</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chillax fool, they promised to make a native linux version</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Anti-Blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joost for Linux &#8212; Amazing PR response&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/#comment-3471</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anti-Blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Joost for Linux &#8212; Amazing PR response&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theantiblogger.com/technology/joost-no-love-for-linux/#comment-3471</guid>
		<description>[...] a week ago, I mentioned my disappointment about there not being a Linux beta for Joost. Today I received this very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a week ago, I mentioned my disappointment about there not being a Linux beta for Joost. Today I received this very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
